So one of the important things to do when putting a collection together, or presumably any publication, is to proof it carefully.
If you're anything like me (prone to a lack of attention to detail, and very easily distra.... oh look, a sparrow!) you might want this to be somebody other than you. If you're lucky you could send your work to someone like David Bateman* for a quick comment on the generality of it and get back 3 pages of typos, spellos, syntactical errors and punctuational faux pas.
I just thought I'd share a couple of the things he picked up on in the first version of The Silence Museum:
untidy bottom of “previously published” paragraph
two different styles of ellipsis on same line
inconsistent capitalization of line-starts
'a lone parenthetic comma' and 'rogue hyphens'
"For “Flambe” the “é” you need is in the Insert menu.(“Menu”! I made a funny! Ha ha ha ha etc.)"
"Almost unbelievably, this line definitely needs another comma. Insert it bravely!"
I thought it would be nice to thank him in the front of the book. 'Thanks to David Bateman, who taught me everything I know about ellipses'** Then I decided to include an additional short poem about him in the collection, but I didn't send it for re-checking because it really was very short, and mentions how he taught me everything I know about ellipses. You know what's coming here, don't you? I spelled ellipses with just one 'l'.
Dho!... I mean Doh!
What's the worst typo or similar you've missed until it was too late?
* David Bateman is an excellent 'silly and serious at the same time' poet, by the way. There's not much of his stuff on the web, but check out the link for his classic 'World's Greatest Impressionist' poem
** There's only ever three dots in an ellipsis
Monday, 26 August 2013
Thursday, 15 August 2013
Book Launched! Woo hoo!
![]() | |
| My 'pin drop' cover wasn't high res enough so I had to change it. |
I hadn't expected big numbers, but it sort of grew so I ended up in the exhibition room upstairs with a lovely audience of 50 people!!
I was really nervous because of the people I knew were coming - old school friends, ex colleagues, poets, the parents, library folk, friends and acquaintances, many of whom hadn't seen me perform before. There was a decent number of borrowers too, who'll look at me in a different light now!... and the Boss of All Libraries (not her real title) who was hugely supportive.
I'm often asked if I have a book and, with 99 poems published and 24 placed in competitions, it was time bring some of these together as a collection. I know I should have touted it around 'proper' poetry publishers but I grew impatient to get something out, so published it myself. The themes emerged as 'silences' - our unspoken feelings, yearnings and secrets... with some humorous pieces for light relief. The 75-page collection is available HERE for £7.99 + post and will eventually be on Amazon (but if you email me at clare [at] clarekirwan [dot] co [dot] uk I'll send you one for £6 + post).
Friday, 9 August 2013
Funny Submission Guidleines #2
My first post of Funny Submissions Guidelines went down well, so here are a few more entertaining ones. These are all markets for short fiction, by the way.
The Canary Press:
Payment: We strongly believe that writers should be paid for their work, especially considering what the Kardashians are paid and the price of alcohol these days.
Not really a submission guideline, but I love this on the same site:
"...join our email list we will never give away your email address or send you spam, except at Christmas time when, if things are going well, we may send you some actual spam...which will last for years in your kitchen cupboard."
Penny Dreadful (Haunted Press) Yes, even you, as wretched and forlorn as you may well be. We want you to submit to us... (their acceptances are on the snidey side, too!... See my post Finding Acceptances.)
Some zines offer services above and beyond to their authors: Space Squid promises: "...not to give your name to the FBI after we find out what goes on in that freakish head of yours."
Flash Fiction zine, Whiskeypaper is much more charming: "We cannot pay you for your story but we love you the same. And we will respond to your submission as soon as possible. We know how it feels to wait and wait and wait. We will do the best we can. We appreciate your patience and sweetness." and: "We dig kindness and light."
But sometimes the years of trauma just leach out into the guidelines of more seasoned publications. You can sense the frustration in this fromDaily Science Fiction: "We do not accept reprints. We do not accept reprints. Also, if you were wondering about reprints--nope, we don't take 'em"
and...
"Don't send us another until we send you a response. You can send us another as soon as we send you a response (either "Yea" or "Nay). After, not before. (If that's confusing, ask Grover at Sesame Street. He's really good at prepositions."
And finally...Apex Magazine throws down this gauntlet: "If you are rejected, don’t get angry—instead, become more awesome. Write something better, and better, until we have to accept you."
The Canary Press:
Payment: We strongly believe that writers should be paid for their work, especially considering what the Kardashians are paid and the price of alcohol these days.
Not really a submission guideline, but I love this on the same site:
"...join our email list we will never give away your email address or send you spam, except at Christmas time when, if things are going well, we may send you some actual spam...which will last for years in your kitchen cupboard."
Penny Dreadful (Haunted Press) Yes, even you, as wretched and forlorn as you may well be. We want you to submit to us... (their acceptances are on the snidey side, too!... See my post Finding Acceptances.)
Some zines offer services above and beyond to their authors: Space Squid promises: "...not to give your name to the FBI after we find out what goes on in that freakish head of yours."
Flash Fiction zine, Whiskeypaper is much more charming: "We cannot pay you for your story but we love you the same. And we will respond to your submission as soon as possible. We know how it feels to wait and wait and wait. We will do the best we can. We appreciate your patience and sweetness." and: "We dig kindness and light."
But sometimes the years of trauma just leach out into the guidelines of more seasoned publications. You can sense the frustration in this fromDaily Science Fiction: "We do not accept reprints. We do not accept reprints. Also, if you were wondering about reprints--nope, we don't take 'em"
and...
"Don't send us another until we send you a response. You can send us another as soon as we send you a response (either "Yea" or "Nay). After, not before. (If that's confusing, ask Grover at Sesame Street. He's really good at prepositions."
And finally...Apex Magazine throws down this gauntlet: "If you are rejected, don’t get angry—instead, become more awesome. Write something better, and better, until we have to accept you."
Friday, 2 August 2013
Brought down to size
I was brought back to earth this week after I've been insufferably full of myself lately. I'm interested in other people's views...
I had my first '1 star' review on Amazon. A Mrs E Carlill from Stroud thought I was 'A bit odd'. No shit, Sherlock. The words 'unsettling', 'dark underbelly' and 'shaky ground' appear in my own description of it. Previous reviews use 'quirky' and 'twisted. But Mrs Carlill went for it anyway.
Now, am I alone in thinking that if something is adequately described, well written and absolutely free it is entirely unreasonable to just give it one star? What score would she give something that mis-represents itself, is full of typos and causes serious offense? I'm not losing sleep over it: it still averages 4.5 stars and her review is more about her own choices and tastes than my work, but is it fair to be quite so damning?
If something isn't to your taste, do YOU put the boot in or just walk away?
I had my first '1 star' review on Amazon. A Mrs E Carlill from Stroud thought I was 'A bit odd'. No shit, Sherlock. The words 'unsettling', 'dark underbelly' and 'shaky ground' appear in my own description of it. Previous reviews use 'quirky' and 'twisted. But Mrs Carlill went for it anyway.
Now, am I alone in thinking that if something is adequately described, well written and absolutely free it is entirely unreasonable to just give it one star? What score would she give something that mis-represents itself, is full of typos and causes serious offense? I'm not losing sleep over it: it still averages 4.5 stars and her review is more about her own choices and tastes than my work, but is it fair to be quite so damning?
If something isn't to your taste, do YOU put the boot in or just walk away?
Monday, 29 July 2013
Brother – Killed by Radiator
So this is the story I nearly named my collection after, but didn't - mum wasn't keen.
It's in Tales from a Broken Biro: There Will Be Ink
, and is a true story - as true as I remember it all happening when I was 8.
Brother – Killed by Radiator
News traveled on short white socks as fleet as angels: my brother was dead.
It was a rainy playtime – he’d been playing off-ground-tick between the desks in a downstairs classroom. I didn’t see it but always imagine his thin, pale limbs crushed beneath the monstrous weight of that ancient radiator.
It was a fine old school. The desks were autographed by generations of previous occupants: surfaces scarred, and undersides tattooed. In the big class downstairs, would one desk have my brother’s name carved into it? It didn’t seem the sort of thing he’d do.
Not like me – I’d chalked pictures of made-up gods in the playground and invented a new religion (which was frowned upon).
No-one in her class ever read as well as him, Mrs Fransom had told my mother. “A lovely, quiet boy.” People always said that sort of thing about him.
I, on the other hand, was troublesome. We were new to the area, and I’d blotted my copy book early on by wetting myself halfway through ‘Twinkle, Twinkle’ because I’d been too scared to put my hand up. It’s funny what you remember and what you don’t.
My brother lay beneath monstrous plumbing as rain threw itself at the windows. He probably didn’t even cry. He just lay there, splayed out on the block flooring, gazing towards heaven like a martyred saint in a library book.
And it turned out quite quickly he wasn’t dead after all, but, just for a minute, I was giddy with the possibility.
(c) Clare Kirwan
N.B. No brothers were harmed in the writing of this story
It's in Tales from a Broken Biro: There Will Be Ink
Brother – Killed by Radiator
News traveled on short white socks as fleet as angels: my brother was dead.
It was a rainy playtime – he’d been playing off-ground-tick between the desks in a downstairs classroom. I didn’t see it but always imagine his thin, pale limbs crushed beneath the monstrous weight of that ancient radiator.
It was a fine old school. The desks were autographed by generations of previous occupants: surfaces scarred, and undersides tattooed. In the big class downstairs, would one desk have my brother’s name carved into it? It didn’t seem the sort of thing he’d do.
Not like me – I’d chalked pictures of made-up gods in the playground and invented a new religion (which was frowned upon).
No-one in her class ever read as well as him, Mrs Fransom had told my mother. “A lovely, quiet boy.” People always said that sort of thing about him.
I, on the other hand, was troublesome. We were new to the area, and I’d blotted my copy book early on by wetting myself halfway through ‘Twinkle, Twinkle’ because I’d been too scared to put my hand up. It’s funny what you remember and what you don’t.
My brother lay beneath monstrous plumbing as rain threw itself at the windows. He probably didn’t even cry. He just lay there, splayed out on the block flooring, gazing towards heaven like a martyred saint in a library book.
And it turned out quite quickly he wasn’t dead after all, but, just for a minute, I was giddy with the possibility.
(c) Clare Kirwan
N.B. No brothers were harmed in the writing of this story
Thursday, 18 July 2013
How to win Poetry Competitions - top 10 tips
As a regular entrant to (and occasional winner of) writing competitions it was eye-opening to be administrator of a poetry competition recently and see the process from 'the other side' with 356 entries, both online and by post.
First, what doesn't work: an A4 'do not bend' envelope, first class post, two months prior to deadline and posh paper make no difference at all if the poem's poor. A better poem triple folded, second class, last minute is still far more likely to win. (Someone even attached a full CV - entirely superfluous as decent competitions are judged anonymously based solely on the poem.)
Taking entry fees off some poets felt like taking sweets from babies and I worry about unscrupulous competitions whose aim is solely to make money - especially beware of ones where the entry fee is big and the prizes small. (Winning Writers lists contests to avoid).
I was only the admin, but I looked at the entries with interest and, as I've been placed a few times in competitions myself, began to get an idea of what judges are looking for. So here are my top ten tips on getting placed in competitions:
1. Read the instructions! I received entries with no cheque, no contact details, in file formats I couldn't open etc. Many poets put their names on the poem itself - despite instructions not to! - or double spaced their poems so they spread onto two sheets when the rules clearly said one sheet only!
2. Don't write everything in capital letters. The rules may not state this, but just don't. See Capital Idea
3. Check for mistakes in spelling and puncutation
4. Pay attention to detail - edit carefully, make sure every word is the right word and has earned its place in the poem. Get someone to look it over for you if you can.
5. A strong opening grabs the attention - pay special attention to the first few lines... and the last few.
6. A strong voice or character engages the reader more than abstract content
7. It has to stand out from the competition - so send poems with surprising and interesting subject matter
8. The same is true of titles. Spend time thinking of a title that adds to the poem
9. Read it aloud - judges will often do this and there may be the odd awkward rhythm, or phrase that jars
10. I'm a chronic deadline-hugger. I've still been placed in competitions despite only entering a day or two before the deadline. However half the entries I received were in the last week, and I couldn't help thinking it might be better to arrive before the rush - if only to ensure the postal service and computer systems don't thwart you at the last minute! Just a thought.
Ready to win? these are my favourite sites with up to date details of poetry competitions in the UK and beyond:
Good luck! And remember - it's all subjective. What one judge puts aside another may love.
First, what doesn't work: an A4 'do not bend' envelope, first class post, two months prior to deadline and posh paper make no difference at all if the poem's poor. A better poem triple folded, second class, last minute is still far more likely to win. (Someone even attached a full CV - entirely superfluous as decent competitions are judged anonymously based solely on the poem.)
Taking entry fees off some poets felt like taking sweets from babies and I worry about unscrupulous competitions whose aim is solely to make money - especially beware of ones where the entry fee is big and the prizes small. (Winning Writers lists contests to avoid).
I was only the admin, but I looked at the entries with interest and, as I've been placed a few times in competitions myself, began to get an idea of what judges are looking for. So here are my top ten tips on getting placed in competitions:
1. Read the instructions! I received entries with no cheque, no contact details, in file formats I couldn't open etc. Many poets put their names on the poem itself - despite instructions not to! - or double spaced their poems so they spread onto two sheets when the rules clearly said one sheet only!
2. Don't write everything in capital letters. The rules may not state this, but just don't. See Capital Idea
3. Check for mistakes in spelling and puncutation
4. Pay attention to detail - edit carefully, make sure every word is the right word and has earned its place in the poem. Get someone to look it over for you if you can.
5. A strong opening grabs the attention - pay special attention to the first few lines... and the last few.
6. A strong voice or character engages the reader more than abstract content
7. It has to stand out from the competition - so send poems with surprising and interesting subject matter
8. The same is true of titles. Spend time thinking of a title that adds to the poem
9. Read it aloud - judges will often do this and there may be the odd awkward rhythm, or phrase that jars
10. I'm a chronic deadline-hugger. I've still been placed in competitions despite only entering a day or two before the deadline. However half the entries I received were in the last week, and I couldn't help thinking it might be better to arrive before the rush - if only to ensure the postal service and computer systems don't thwart you at the last minute! Just a thought.
Ready to win? these are my favourite sites with up to date details of poetry competitions in the UK and beyond:
- The Poetry Library - lists reputable competitions
- Prize Magic - the name sounds dodgy but the guy who runs it is keen and thorough
- Morgen Bailey's Writing Blog very detailed competitions calendar... and there's so much more on the site, it's well worth a visit
p.s. If you're new to the blog and wondering what my credentials are, check out this list on my (rather out of date) website.
Saturday, 13 July 2013
Free Flash!
To celebrate this weekend's Wirral Festival of Firsts, my flash collection will be available FREE from around 9am today for 24 hours!
On Saturday 13th July there are more than 70 music acts - acoustic, rock, unplugged, rap, gospel, folk, jazz playing for FREE in the bars of Hoylake from 1pm until late... and did I mentioned the Jazz Parade through town at 1pm? I'm running a Flash workshop as part of First Write at Hoylake Library from 11.30am and then I'll be having some festival time!
On Sunday 14th July we have a 2 mile exhibition of 'Art on the Prom' with displays and workshops at Hoylake Community Centre, and entertainment in and around the Parade Gardens (including me around 4pm!) . Such fun!
To pick up your FREE copy of my collection of 24 flash fiction stories, click here: Tales from a Broken Biro - There Will Be Ink. And don't worry if you don't own a Kindle - it's easy to download their free reading apps and then you can read it on your PC, laptop, tablet or electric toothbrush (just kidding about that last one!).
And if you read this too late, it's less than £2 when it isn't free, so click on the link anyway.
On Saturday 13th July there are more than 70 music acts - acoustic, rock, unplugged, rap, gospel, folk, jazz playing for FREE in the bars of Hoylake from 1pm until late... and did I mentioned the Jazz Parade through town at 1pm? I'm running a Flash workshop as part of First Write at Hoylake Library from 11.30am and then I'll be having some festival time!
On Sunday 14th July we have a 2 mile exhibition of 'Art on the Prom' with displays and workshops at Hoylake Community Centre, and entertainment in and around the Parade Gardens (including me around 4pm!) . Such fun!
To pick up your FREE copy of my collection of 24 flash fiction stories, click here: Tales from a Broken Biro - There Will Be Ink. And don't worry if you don't own a Kindle - it's easy to download their free reading apps and then you can read it on your PC, laptop, tablet or electric toothbrush (just kidding about that last one!).
And if you read this too late, it's less than £2 when it isn't free, so click on the link anyway.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






.jpg)